RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The first targeted therapy in oncology, imatinib, revolutionized chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment and spurred research in targeted therapies for various cancers. CML results from a chromosomal translocation, forming the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Asciminib has been recently approved for third-line refractory or intolerant patients. Treatment-free remission (TFR) is attainable with sustained deep molecular response (DMR) and this approach could be incorporated into pharmacoeconomic models. AIMS: To establish a cost-effectiveness model comparing asciminib to approved third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (bosutinib and ponatinib) with a focus on achieving TFR. Additionally, the budgetary impact of incorporating asciminib as a therapeutic alternative is assessed. METHODS: This model is based on a Markov chain with 7 states. The condition for achieving TFR is to remain for 5 years in DMR state. Efficacy of the model was measured in QALYs, and the costs included in the base case analysis are based in Spain. A probabilistic (PSA) and deterministic analysis (DSA) were carried out to assess the variability of the model. There were achieved 2 independent models comparing asciminib vs bosutinib and asciminib vs ponatinib. RESULTS: Asciminib, when compared with ponatinib, is a cost-saving alternative, as efficacy is similar between alternatives, and asciminib have a lower cost of 30,275. Asciminib showed 4.33 more QALYs and a higher cost (203,591) than bosutinib, resulting in an ICER of 47,010.49 per QALY. PSA shows that the parameters with higher influence in the variability of the model were the probability of transitioning to BP and probabilities of achieving MMR and DMR. A one-way analysis reports that the drug cost has a higher influence on both models, and the discount rate significantly affects the asciminib vs bosutinib model. CONCLUSION: Asciminib broadens therapeutic choices for patient's refractory or intolerant to 2 prior lines of treatment in a cost-effectiveness manner. The costs of drugs significantly impact the overall cost of the disease, emphasizing the importance of the selected discount rates for each drug. Given the relatively low incidence of CML, the introduction of asciminib has a limited budgetary impact, warranting individualized decisions based on patient`s clinical characteristics.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the marginal cost and survival of patients treated with tocilizumab in a university hospital under real-life conditions and to evaluate factors that could influence costs and health outcomes will be evaluated. METHODS: Observational, single-center, retrospective study of a cohort of adult patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 treated with tocilizumab. The one-year restricted mean survival time was analyzed in life-years gained (LYG). The influence of sex, age and severity on patient survival was evaluated. The marginal cost/LYG and marginal cost/survivor ratios were calculated. RESULTS: 508 patients (66 ± 13 years; 32% women) were included. Seventeen percent were admitted to the ICU. Overall survival was 77%. Age older than 71.5 years (HR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.07-1.10; p < 0.001) and ICU admission at initiation of treatment (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.30-3.09; p = 0.002) were identified as risk factors. The total budgetary impact of tocilizumab in the period analyzed was 206,466 euros. The patients with the highest cost per unit of health outcome were those admitted to the ICU and those over 71.5 years, with a marginal cost/LYG of 966 and a marginal cost/survivor of 1,136. CONCLUSION: The efficiency of treatment with tocilizumab is associated with the age and severity of the patients. The figures are lower in all subgroups than the thresholds usually used in cost-effectiveness evaluations. The results of the present study suggest that early first dose of tocilizumab is an efficient strategy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Objetivo: describir el coste marginal y la supervivencia de los pacientes tratados con tocilizumab en un hospital universitario en condiciones de vida real y evaluar los factores que podrían influir en los costes y los resultados en la salud.Metodologíaestudio observacional, retrospectivo y unicéntrico de una cohorte de pacientes adultos infectados con SARS-CoV-2 tratados con tocilizumab. Se analizó, en años de vida ganados (AVG), la media de supervivencia restringida a un año. Se evaluó la influencia del sexo, la edad y la gravedad en la supervivencia de los pacientes. Se calcularon el ratio, el coste marginal/AVG y coste marginal/superviviente.Resultadosse incluyeron 508 pacientes (66 ± 13 años; 32% mujeres). Un 17% ingresó en la UCI. La supervivencia global fue del 77%. Se identificaron como factores de riesgo la edad mayor de 71,5 años (HR=1,08; IC 95% 1,071,10; p < 0,001), y el ingreso en la UCI al iniciar el tratamiento (HR=2,01; IC 95% 1,303,09; p = 0,002). El impacto presupuestario total de tocilizumab en el periodo analizado ascendió a 206.466 . Los pacientes con mayor coste por unidad de resultado en salud son los pacientes ingresados en la UCI y mayores de 71,5 años, que presentan un coste marginal/AVG de 966 y un coste marginal/superviviente de 1.136 .Conclusiónla eficiencia del tratamiento con tocilizumab se asocia a la edad y a la gravedad de los pacientes. Las cifras son inferiores en todos los subgrupos a los umbrales habitualmente utilizados en las evaluaciones coste-efectividad. Los resultados del presente estudio sugieren que el inicio precoz de tocilizumab es una estrategia eficiente. (AU)
Objective: To describe the marginal cost and survival of patients treated with tocilizumab in a university hospital under real-life conditions and to evaluate factors that could influence costs and health outcomes will be evaluated.MethodsObservational, single-center, retrospective study of a cohort of adult patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 treated with tocilizumab. The one-year restricted mean survival time was analyzed in life-years gained (LYG). The influence of sex, age and severity on patient survival was evaluated. The marginal cost/LYG and marginal cost/survivor ratios were calculated.Results508 patients (66 ± 13 years; 32% women) were included. Seventeen percent were admitted to the ICU. Overall survival was 77%. Age older than 71.5 years (HR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.07-1.10; p < 0.001) and ICU admission at initiation of treatment (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.30-3.09; p = 0.002) were identified as risk factors. The total budgetary impact of tocilizumab in the period analyzed was 206,466 euros. The patients with the highest cost per unit of health outcome were those admitted to the ICU and those over 71.5 years, with a marginal cost/LYG of 966 and a marginal cost/survivor of 1,136.ConclusionThe efficiency of treatment with tocilizumab is associated with the age and severity of the patients. The figures are lower in all subgroups than the thresholds usually used in cost-effectiveness evaluations. The results of the present study suggest that early first dose of tocilizumab is an efficient strategy. (AU)
